<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another law professor speaks, and I answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.odonnellweb.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468</link>
	<description>General Geekery from Fredericksburg VA</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 7th Country Fair Is Open! &#124; The Country Fair</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8676</link>
		<dc:creator>The 7th Country Fair Is Open! &#124; The Country Fair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8676</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris, of O&#8217;Donnell Web (Not a Homeschooling Blog), pans a big old paper written about homeschooling in &#8220;Another Law Professor Speaks, and I Answer&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris, of O&#8217;Donnell Web (Not a Homeschooling Blog), pans a big old paper written about homeschooling in &#8220;Another Law Professor Speaks, and I Answer&#8220; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8622</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8622</guid>
		<description>Exactly my beef, Velma -- it makes feminism and advanced university degrees look stupid and poorly researched. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my beef, Velma &#8212; it makes feminism and advanced university degrees look stupid and poorly researched. <img src='http://www.odonnellweb.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Velma Beale</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8619</link>
		<dc:creator>Velma Beale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8619</guid>
		<description>As a liberal, feminist, university educated (MA +), atheist, former college instructor, retired public school teacher, homeschooling grandmother I resent the faulty assumptions this paper is based upon. And if the paper is based on faulty assumptions, then the conclusions are, by definition, flawed. If you set up a straw man to topple, you should at least have the honesty to say, &quot;If this is the case, then...&quot; and not go on as if this was established fact. Even her ionterpretations of law seem very flawed in my opinion (see original post above).

I also resent the fact that she has set herself up as representing the view point of liberal educated women, at least in the eyes of many readers.

Any paper that is grant funded that has no research into the foundational &quot;problem,&quot; and an unbiased view of previous approaches to it, is not worth the paper it is printed on, and is certainly not worthy of grant funding and publication by a university professor. Even if her law points were valid (I cannot judge that), it is still most unscholarly. I wish I could get grant funding for sitting in my chair and writing about some unfounded pet theory off the top of my head (a most dangerous place to be).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a liberal, feminist, university educated (MA +), atheist, former college instructor, retired public school teacher, homeschooling grandmother I resent the faulty assumptions this paper is based upon. And if the paper is based on faulty assumptions, then the conclusions are, by definition, flawed. If you set up a straw man to topple, you should at least have the honesty to say, &#8220;If this is the case, then&#8230;&#8221; and not go on as if this was established fact. Even her ionterpretations of law seem very flawed in my opinion (see original post above).</p>
<p>I also resent the fact that she has set herself up as representing the view point of liberal educated women, at least in the eyes of many readers.</p>
<p>Any paper that is grant funded that has no research into the foundational &#8220;problem,&#8221; and an unbiased view of previous approaches to it, is not worth the paper it is printed on, and is certainly not worthy of grant funding and publication by a university professor. Even if her law points were valid (I cannot judge that), it is still most unscholarly. I wish I could get grant funding for sitting in my chair and writing about some unfounded pet theory off the top of my head (a most dangerous place to be).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corn and Oil &#187; Homeschooling is &#8220;viable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8618</link>
		<dc:creator>Corn and Oil &#187; Homeschooling is &#8220;viable&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8618</guid>
		<description>[...] Another law professor speaks, and I answer - O&#8217;Donnell Web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another law professor speaks, and I answer &#8211; O&#8217;Donnell Web [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HEM Editor&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illiberal Education: Constitutional Constraints on Homeschooling</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8616</link>
		<dc:creator>HEM Editor&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Illiberal Education: Constitutional Constraints on Homeschooling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8616</guid>
		<description>[...] HEM News &amp; Commentary Editor Valerie Bonham Moon posted a note to her blog about a new research paper which is raising waves in homeschooling circles. Valerie gives a nod to homeschooling dad Chris O&#8217;Donnell for unearthing this find, and I likewise send appreciation to Chris for being right on top of things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] HEM News &#38; Commentary Editor Valerie Bonham Moon posted a note to her blog about a new research paper which is raising waves in homeschooling circles. Valerie gives a nod to homeschooling dad Chris O&#8217;Donnell for unearthing this find, and I likewise send appreciation to Chris for being right on top of things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girls On Girls Gone Wild (defining each other) &#171; Cocking A Snook!</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8607</link>
		<dc:creator>Girls On Girls Gone Wild (defining each other) &#171; Cocking A Snook!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8607</guid>
		<description>[...] Girls On Girls Gone Wild (defining each&#160;other)  9 06 2007   Chris has been on top of liberal ps-supporting women defining homeschool women by class and calling for our status to become a matter of public policy concern, so I&#8217;m following his blog closely and urge you to too, if you can. I just posted this comment there: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Girls On Girls Gone Wild (defining each&nbsp;other)  9 06 2007   Chris has been on top of liberal ps-supporting women defining homeschool women by class and calling for our status to become a matter of public policy concern, so I&#8217;m following his blog closely and urge you to too, if you can. I just posted this comment there: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom of All Seasons</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom of All Seasons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>Here in Michigan, being &quot;held back&quot; for failure to progress at &quot;grade level&quot; in a public school can only be recommended by teachers or school systems. A child&#039;s parent or guardian always has the right to decline such a recommendation and the child will be moved into the next grade level. As my neighbor, a public school teacher says, &quot;You can lead a child to information, but you cannot MAKE him think.&quot;

Among the hallowed &quot;subjects&quot; of math, reading, English, science and social studies, there is no specific content required of non-public schools, which is how the &quot;highly regarded&quot; private schools that my nieces and nephews attend avoid teaching the scientific basis for that &quot;nasty little theory&quot; of evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Michigan, being &#8220;held back&#8221; for failure to progress at &#8220;grade level&#8221; in a public school can only be recommended by teachers or school systems. A child&#8217;s parent or guardian always has the right to decline such a recommendation and the child will be moved into the next grade level. As my neighbor, a public school teacher says, &#8220;You can lead a child to information, but you cannot MAKE him think.&#8221;</p>
<p>Among the hallowed &#8220;subjects&#8221; of math, reading, English, science and social studies, there is no specific content required of non-public schools, which is how the &#8220;highly regarded&#8221; private schools that my nieces and nephews attend avoid teaching the scientific basis for that &#8220;nasty little theory&#8221; of evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>Thanks JJ.  It&#039;s funny, it didn&#039;t cross my mind that the homeschooled kids were supposed to be the ones ending up ethically servile. I&#039;ve got some reading to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks JJ.  It&#8217;s funny, it didn&#8217;t cross my mind that the homeschooled kids were supposed to be the ones ending up ethically servile. I&#8217;ve got some reading to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8587</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8587</guid>
		<description>Running out to busy few hours - Rolfe, this is long and high-level but you can handle it. :)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nhen.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=614&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read this NHEN discussion&lt;/a&gt;straight through to the end, and you will understand where &quot;ethical servility&quot; comes from, and why it is SO insidiously wrong. And some of the best responses to it, that we&#039;ve teased out as Thinking Parents . . . back later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running out to busy few hours &#8211; Rolfe, this is long and high-level but you can handle it. <img src='http://www.odonnellweb.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   <a href="http://www.nhen.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=614" rel="nofollow">Read this NHEN discussion</a>straight through to the end, and you will understand where &#8220;ethical servility&#8221; comes from, and why it is SO insidiously wrong. And some of the best responses to it, that we&#8217;ve teased out as Thinking Parents . . . back later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nance Confer</title>
		<link>http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468&#038;cpage=1#comment-8586</link>
		<dc:creator>Nance Confer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.odonnellweb.com/?p=3468#comment-8586</guid>
		<description>Oh, that link WAS worth visiting -- http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/06/teach_your_chil.html

Thanks Chris.

Nance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that link WAS worth visiting &#8212; <a href="http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/06/teach_your_chil.html" rel="nofollow">http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/p....._chil.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks Chris.</p>
<p>Nance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
